Thursday, February 11, 2010

Gamechangers, Part Deux


A few posts ago, I promised you a Top Five list (with Honorable Mentions!), and though that post included only two main entries, a Top Five list, Gentle Reader, is what you have every right to expect and a Top Five list is what you shall receive. Herewith, then, further entries in the list of Gamechanger Volumes in Twentieth-Century Poetry. A recap: we’re sticking to 1925-1975 for this list (between the release of the Ezra Pound Cantos concept album -- you know, the one with the cool cover and a couple of great hits but also some drum solos and noodling keyboard bits you could, in retrospect, do without – and the release of Dolomite, starring Rudy Ray Moore); and we’re looking for volumes that a chock-full of great poems which, individually but especially when taken together, articulate a new direction for poetry, especially a direction subsequent poets have followed. And so, without further throat-clearing:

Number Three: John Ashbery’s Self-Portrait in a Convex Mirror

Close readers of this here melopoeic blog might recall that the original terminus of the period to be covered by this list was 1974, but I have since realized that while the Watergate scandal and the resignation of Richard Nixon formed my political consciousness in profound ways, to link this Top Five list to an event in American political history would be like, well, it would be like an English department linking its distribution requirement to something like the passage of the First Reform Bill in 1832. But I also realized that sticking to that earlier date would require me to nominate Ashbery’s 1956 volume, Some Trees. Now, I was sorely tempted by that possibility. The earlier book’s not only got some fantastic poems in it (“The Picture of Little J.A. in a Prospect of Flowers,” “A Long Novel,” “Le livre est sur la table”), and it not only has cool prose poems like “The Young Son,” but it also has the benefit of what must have been the freshness of a lilac-soaked May afternoon amidst the monuments of Late Modernism and the well-wrought urns of post-Modernist formalism that littered the literary landscape at the time of its appearance.

But I’m plumping for Self-Portrait. Look, it boasts a bunch of poems that show up on numerous critics’ best-of lists: “Forties Flick,” “Scheherezade,” “Hop o’ My Thumb,” “Märchenbilder,” and the title poem. More than that, though, it adds to the Surrealist play and generally Frenchy feel (you know, like when you see the human arm torch-holders along the wall of the Beast’s palace in Cocteau’s La Belle et la Bete) of the earlier poems a range of cultural reference that stretches from Parmigianino (whose painting inspires the title poem) to Van Camp’s Pork and Beans (or a sign for same, which shows up in “Grand Galop” along with the only high-littrachah puke sound I’ve ever run across: “Puaagh. Vomit. Puaaaaagh. More vomit”).

But wait, there’s more. There is, in “Self-Portrait in a Convex Mirror,” a seriously playful meditation on the duties of representation and the responsibilities of evading them, an ars poetica at least partially encapsulated by these lines:

We see only postures of the dream,
Riders of the motion that swings the face
Into view under evening skies, with no
False disarray as proof of authenticity.
But it is life englobed.

Am I wrong to read a not-so-subtle kick at Confessionalism in the penultimate line-and-a-half there? And am I not right that the last line quoted is the shit?

This somber blog will, in the near future, offer its own meditation on play in poetry and why those alliteratively conjoined terms are GOOD THINGS, but Ashbery was there first, was present, we might even say, at something like the creation of a poetics dedicated to the proposition that a Magrittean atmosphere, a Cornellesque knack for juxtaposition (Ashbery is also, it turns out, a hell of a collagist), and a healthy appetite for the strange within the familiar are perhaps more interesting than our individual psyches’ struggles laid out in self-portraits in institutional glassless mirrors.

But you know what? I’d put this book on my list for this stanza, which concludes “As One Put Drunk into the Packet-Boat”:

The night sheen takes over. A moon of cistercian pallor
Has climbed to the center of heaven, installed,
Finally involved with the business of darkness.
And a sigh heaves from all the small things on earth,
The books, the papers, the old garters and union-suit buttons
Kept in a white cardboard box somewhere, and all the lower
Versions of cities flattened under the equalizing night.
The summer demands and takes away too much,
But night, the reserved, the reticent, gives more than it takes.

Kind of like this book.

4 comments:

  1. Top 5 is hard. Williams, Bishop, Merrill, Stevens, Frost, Ammons... I was glad to see that Lowell earned at least honorable mention. I'll be interested to see your final 2 picks. Next list: Desert island?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Well, not Pat, if that IS your real name, you have a point. Which is why, of course, I cheat with Honorable Mentions. Now, as to the specifics you mention: Frost is of course a great one, and a gamechanger, but the gamechanging volume, to my mind, is Mountain Interval (1916), which falls outside the temporal boundary I established with all due arbitrariness. Stevens and Williams are harder, because though Harmonium and Spring and All are similarly disqualified, the great long poems of their later volumes fit right into the period, both can claim some important influence on subsequent poets and their work. Hmmm. It might be interesting to Top Five something like "Crucial Late-Career Volumes" sometime. Merrill and Ammons are poets I admire a great deal, and each has books that strike me as important shift points in their careers. I'm not sure I see either as changing the *game* itself, though even as I type I am thinking of the post-modernist long poem and turning over some interesting possibilities . . .

    The gamechanger thing is tricky. Friends have, for example, asked me about Larkin. Gamechanger? Really? (The answer, btw, is yes. Look at what dominated the English periodicals in the late 40s and then read the poems of The Less Deceived and tell me whether the goalposts weren't moved by the achievements of that volume).

    RE: Bishop -- tune in to a future episode.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I'm glad to see SPCM there of course and who can deny it? But I so much want Three Poems there instead, and, as the era of the 'prose poem' seems to grow apace, maybe it's still changing the game. Whether or not that's true (I'm not expert enough to decide what changes the game), TP is still THE prose poem book to "beat."

    Really glad about Life Studies; that certainly changed Lowell's game and blew me away in the bargain, way back when I first read it.

    I think there has to be something by WC Williams and/or a Black Mountain figure. Just sayin'.

    ReplyDelete